Skip to content

Bikes and scooters · head to head

Avenger 220 Cruise vs Classic 350

Save New comparison

Royal Enfield

Classic 350

Ex-showroom price ₹1.89 lakh – ₹2.26 lakh ex-showroom, Delhi

Quick verdict

  • Avenger 220 Cruise is better for light and easy to handle.

Computed from stored specifications, the published bikes and scooters scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.

Specifications side by side

Spec
Avenger 220 Cruise
Classic 350
Overview
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Fuel
Petrol
Petrol
Petrol
Yes
Yes
Variants
1
—
Colours
Auburn Black, Moon White
Signature White, Emerald, Stealth Black, Gun Grey, Gorkha Green, Commando Sand, Medallion Bronze, Madras Red, Redditch Red
Engine and performance
Engine displacement
220 cc
349 cc
Cylinders
1
1
Cooling
Oil-cooled
Air-oil cooled
Max power
19 PS
20.2 PS
Power (as stated)
13.99 kW (19.03 PS) @ 8500 rpm
20.2 BHP @ 6100 RPM (14.87 KW)
Max power converted from kW or hp
—
Yes
Max torque
17.55 Nm
27 Nm
Transmission
—
5-speed
Dimensions and weight
Kerb weight
163 kg
195 kg
Kerb weight (as stated)
163 kg
195 kg
Seat height
737 mm
805 mm
Ground clearance
169 mm
170 mm
Fuel tank
13 litres
13 litres
Brakes and tyres
ABS
Single-channel
Dual channel
Front brake
Disc 280 mm
Disc 300 mm
Rear brake
Drum 130 mm
Disc 270 mm
Tyres
Tube type
Tube type (spoke wheel) / Tubeless (alloy wheel)
Price
Ex-showroom price from
₹1,34,715
₹1,88,934
Ex-showroom price up to
—
₹2,26,069
Ex-showroom price city
Delhi
Delhi

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Pros and cons

Avenger 220 Cruise

  • Pro: Kerb weight of 163 kg, lighter than 91% of the 36 cruisers on Comparezi that state it
  • Con: Less powerful than 96% of the 51 cruisers on Comparezi that state it (19 PS)
  • Con: Less torque than 96% of the 51 cruisers on Comparezi that state it (17.55 Nm)

Classic 350

  • Pro: Dual-channel ABS
  • Con: Less powerful than 90% of the 51 cruisers on Comparezi that state it (20.2 PS)
  • Con: Less torque than 80% of the 51 cruisers on Comparezi that state it (27 Nm)
  • Con: Taller seat than 91% of the 47 cruisers on Comparezi that state it (805 mm)
Compare