Cars · head to head

mu-X vs Kodiaq

Save New comparison

Isuzu

mu-X

Ex-showroom price ₹34.53 lakh – ₹37.99 lakh ex-showroom

Skoda

Kodiaq

Ex-showroom price From ₹36.99 lakh ex-showroom

Specifications side by side

Show only differences (29)

Spec

mu-X

Kodiaq

Overview

Body type

SUV

Fuel

Diesel

Petrol

—

Yes

Diesel

Yes

—

Variants

Colours

Nautilus Blue, Red Spinel Mica, Silky White Pearl, Galena Grey, Black Mica, Silver Metallic

Moon White, Magic Black, Graphite Grey, Race Blue, Bronx Gold

Warranty

—

4 years / 1,00,000 km

Engine and performance

Engine displacement

1,898 cc

1,984 cc

Engines

1898 cc diesel

1984 cc petrol

Max power

163.2 PS

203.9 PS

Power (as stated)

Diesel: 120 kW (163 hp) @ 377 rad/s (3600 rpm)

Petrol: 150 kW at 4,500 - 6,000 rpm

Max power converted from kW or hp

Yes

Max torque

360 Nm

320 Nm

Transmission

6-speed Automatic

7-speed DSG (4x4)

Automatic available

Yes

Mileage

—

Petrol: 14.86 km/l (certified under CMVR Rule 115)

Dimensions and weight

Seating

—

5 or 7 seats

Seats

—

Length

—

4,758 mm

Width

—

1,864 mm

Height

—

1,679 mm

Wheelbase

—

2,791 mm

Ground clearance

—

155 mm

Boot space

235 litres

281 litres

Fuel tank

55 litres

62 litres

Kerb weight (as stated)

—

1765 to 1825 kg

Kerb weight

—

1,765 kg

Safety and features

Airbags

6 (Driver, front passenger, front side and full length curtain)

9 (2 front + 1 centre + 2 front side + 2 rear side + 2 curtain), all variants

Airbags (most on any variant)

ADAS

—

Adaptive Cruise, Front Assist, Lane Assist, Side Assist etc. on Sportline and Selection L&K

Sunroof

—

Sliding panoramic (all variants)

Price

Ex-showroom price from

₹34,53,240

₹36,99,000

Ex-showroom price up to

₹37,98,580

—

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Pros and cons

mu-X

Con: Less boot space than 92% of the 55 SUVs on Comparezi that state it (235 litres)

Kodiaq

Pro: Up to 9 airbags, more than 86% of the 60 SUVs on Comparezi that state it
Con: Less boot space than 90% of the 55 SUVs on Comparezi that state it (281 litres)
Con: Lower ground clearance than 96% of the 29 SUVs on Comparezi that state it (155 mm)